angry at the melody

"Everything has chains... absolutely nothing's changed. Take my hand, not my picture, spilled my tincture. All the things that others want for me. Can't buy what I want because it's free. Can't buy what I want because it's free. Can't be what you want because I'm... Why ain't it supposed to be just fun?! Oh, to live and die, let it be done, I figure I'll be damned, all alone like I began..."

Music - 365 Films


angels-and-angles:

Wow, accidentally deleted my original post. Reblogging so I can keep it in my archives.

——

As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is…

When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she searches for a smarter, richer, and more handsome boyfriend. There is little you can do without feeling like a dick. All in all, one of the meanest things a girl can do, whether they mean it or not.”

and ”The perennial location of nice guys everywhere.”

Although this hypothetical situation could work both ways, friendzone is almost always applied to a man who is rejected by a woman. Therefore, there is something inherently unequal, something inherently sexist about the term “friendzone”. But what and why?

From my experience, this is what friend zone is. A “nice guy” pursues a woman, but isn’t forward with his intentions from the get-go like, say, a “jerk”. The woman is pleased to see a man who is interested in her not as a sexual object but as a human being and wishes for things to stay that way. The man is not satisfied with seeing the woman as a human being because being “expected to support a girl” is a bad deal if she’s not putting out.

Before I delve into the sociological aspects of this, I just want to point out that ”friendzone” is no more pleasant for a woman than it is a man. First, that is to say unrequited love works both ways, but the person who doesn’t return affections is considered mean only when she’s a woman. And second, what option does the woman have in a traditional “friendzone” situation? Just stop talking to a close friend to avoid “leading him on”? In high school, I found out my best friend of 2 years liked me. Having to tell him I didn’t feel the same way and being immediately ex-communicated via Facebook status (“Thanks for wasting my time”) was one of the worst things that ever happened to me. Were our two years of friendship invalid because I didn’t want anything more? Was all our time together really wasted because there was no hypothetical pay off?

Guys who do this and claim to be “nice guys” are the worst misogynists because of their sense of entitlement toward a woman. They make investments in property and expect their dividends. They are fake friends. They are selfish. And they will jump at the chance to vilify you and victimize themselves when their attempts at manipulation don’t work. Clearly, “friendzone” is the remnant of a phenomenon that has plagued women since the beginning of time: women are not independent creatures. Our love lives exist only in the context of a man’s desire. When we make independent decisions, we are subject to a host of derogatory terms. “Slut” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “yes”. “Friendzone” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “no”

Bravo.


  1. syntaria reblogged this from lifeiscandy
  2. dulce-sf-schiefer596 reblogged this from kiriamaya
  3. zachy-poo reblogged this from iamawesomesobetterwatchit and added:
    I agree with parts of this. A lot of guys put a lot of work being there for a girl that they like because, it seems...
  4. monsterstarkid reblogged this from angels-and-angles
  5. bittersweetfluidquandary reblogged this from flapjackstate
  6. madladyred reblogged this from flapjackstate
  7. asri-the-dirty-puzzle reblogged this from dailymurf and added:
    Works also with gay and lesbian “friendzones” and yes, if the interested party leaves they could be seen as bastard for...
  8. les-jeux-sont-faits reblogged this from bearbearpdx
  9. iamawesomesobetterwatchit reblogged this from mbaileys and added:
    When you are yourself friend-zoned, it sucks. So all reactions to it are to an extent justified. Nobody thinks...
  10. bitsofstyrofoam reblogged this from pubicbone
  11. lifeiscandy reblogged this from usuallyjusta-tshirt
  12. caughtunawares reblogged this from untoapearl
  13. untoapearl reblogged this from pubicbone
  14. pubicbone reblogged this from flapjackstate
  15. ditt0o reblogged this from dailymurf
  16. flapjackstate reblogged this from dailymurf
  17. dailymurf reblogged this from bearbearpdx and added:
    This is the reason hardly any of my past male “friends” have stuck around.
  18. bearwithmeimstilllearningwhoiam reblogged this from angels-and-angles and added:
    -_- First off let me say that...don’t even agree...your...
  19. bearbearpdx reblogged this from resmc
  20. meganski23 reblogged this from mbaileys
  21. mbaileys reblogged this from crackinthecloud
  22. ricepaperlust reblogged this from feministhistorian
  23. myna-k reblogged this from danceswithfaeriesunderthemoon
  24. heyheyjen reblogged this from verociouslion
  25. verociouslion reblogged this from arashikami
  26. aecw reblogged this from arashikami and added:
    While I wonder call them the WORST misogynists, the whole notion of “I’m treating you like a human being because...
  27. arashikami reblogged this from toofairytale and added:
    By angels-and-angles: